Strain gauges · Measurement

Torque transducer: shear stress, 45° strain and full-bridge signal

For a solid or hollow shaft under torsion, calculate shear stress, principal strains at ±45° and the strain-gauge full-bridge signal from torque, diameters and material data.

DMSKeil 2017
01

Inputs

Circular or annular section without keyways, Saint-Venant torsion; misalignment of the 45° gauges reduces the signal and couples in bending.

02

Results

Enter values and run the calculation.

Method

What is calculated?

Pure torsion produces principal normal stresses at ±45° to the axis equal in magnitude to the shear stress, with opposite signs. Two perpendicular gauge pairs at 45°, wired alternately into a full bridge, add all four strain magnitudes and are insensitive to axial force, bending and temperature. Keil's example: hollow shaft 24/14 mm gives W_p = 2400 mm³; at 400 N·m τ = 167 N/mm² and ε = 1054 µm/m.

Equations

τ = M_t/W_p (Keil Gl. 10.35)

W_p = π/(16d_a)·(d_a⁴ − d_i⁴) (Gl. 10.36)

ε₁ = −ε₂ = τ·(1+ν)/E (Gl. 10.38, 10.39)

U_M/U_B = k·ε₁ (Vollbrücke, Gl. 10.41)

Procedure

Step by step

  1. Enter torque, diameters and material data.
  2. Choose the full bridge with two 45° pairs 180° apart to compensate bending.
  3. Match the signal with the amplifier range and rated strain (≈ 1000 µm/m).

Typical mistake

Using longitudinal strain instead of 45° strain or computing τ with the bending section modulus.

Practice

Application and limits

Torque measuring shafts, drivetrain measurements and retrofit instrumentation of shafts, including slip-ring or telemetry transmission.

Circular or annular section without keyways, Saint-Venant torsion; misalignment of the 45° gauges reduces the signal and couples in bending.

Source

Technical basis

Keil, Dehnungsmessstreifen, 2nd ed. 2017, sec. 10.2.3 torsionally loaded objects, eqs. (10.35)–(10.41); sec. 4.5, eq. (4.18).

The source supports the equation structure and worked examples; this calculator does not replace calibration of the measuring chain.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Why ε = τ(1+ν)/E?

From Hooke's law with σ₁ = −σ₂ = τ, ε₁ = (σ₁ − νσ₂)/E = τ(1+ν)/E, equivalent to τ/(2G).

Is one gauge pair enough?

As a half bridge yes, but bending is then not compensated; Keil recommends two opposite pairs.

How do long rotor leads matter?

Keil's fig. 10.20 shows leads should be placed in adjacent bridge arms so their resistance changes cancel.