Strain gauges · Measurement

0°/45°/90° rosette: principal strains and principal direction

From the three strains of a rectangular rosette, compute centre and radius of the strain circle, principal strains ε₁, ε₂, maximum shear strain and the unambiguous orientation angle α per Keil Tab. 9.1.

DMSKeil 2017
01

Inputs

Homogeneous strain field under the rosette, plane stress at the free surface; prefer stacked rosettes under steep gradients.

02

Results

Enter values and run the calculation.

Method

What is calculated?

Three strains in known directions define the strain circle uniquely. For the 0°/45°/90° rosette a and c lie on one diameter, so their mean gives the circle centre; b fixes the angle. Because tan 2α is ambiguous, Keil's Tab. 9.1 assigns the angle uniquely within 0° ≤ α < 180° from the signs of numerator and denominator. The angle is measured counter-clockwise from reference direction a to principal direction 1 (ε₁).

Equations

m = (ε_a+ε_c)/2 (Keil Gl. 9.51)

tan 2α = (2ε_b − ε_a − ε_c)/(ε_a − ε_c) (Gl. 9.55), Quadrant nach Tab. 9.1

r = ½·√2·√[(ε_a−ε_b)² + (ε_c−ε_b)²] (Gl. 9.63)

ε₁,₂ = m ± r (Gl. 9.65), γ_max = 2r (Gl. 9.64)

Procedure

Step by step

  1. Check grid labelling a, b, c per Keil fig. 9.23 (b is 45° counter-clockwise from a).
  2. Enter strains with sign; correct transverse sensitivity beforehand if needed.
  3. Transfer the principal strains to the principal-stress calculator.

Typical mistake

Swapping grids b and c or measuring the angle clockwise – both give a principal direction off by 90°.

Practice

Application and limits

Experimental stress analysis on components with unknown principal directions: castings, welded structures, pressure vessels, chassis components.

Homogeneous strain field under the rosette, plane stress at the free surface; prefer stacked rosettes under steep gradients.

Source

Technical basis

Keil, Dehnungsmessstreifen, 2nd ed. 2017, sec. 9.8 evaluation of 0°/45°/90° rosettes, eqs. (9.48)–(9.66), Tab. 9.1, figs. 9.23, 9.25.

The source supports the equation structure and worked examples; this calculator does not replace calibration of the measuring chain.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Why does Z = 0, N > 0 give α = 0°?

Then ε_b = m and ε_a > ε_c: direction a already is principal direction 1.

What is the third principal strain?

Normal to the surface: ε₃ = −ν/(1−ν)·(ε₁+ε₂) per eq. 9.66; the principal-stress calculator reports it.

Does the evaluation apply dynamically?

Yes, if all three grids are sampled simultaneously; otherwise the time offset distorts the angle (Keil 10.3.3).