βk = αk/n

Notch effect factor from stress concentration and support factor

βk is always smaller than αk because the support factor n accounts for local stress relief through plastic support.

MINTSI
01

Inputs

Actual strength-reduction factor caused by the notch.

Theoretical, material-independent stress magnification at the notch (from charts or FEA).

Material- and size-dependent support effect; n > 1, approaching 1 for brittle behaviour.

02

Result

Select a target and calculate.

Calculation

βk = αk / n

βk is always smaller than αk because the support factor n accounts for local stress relief through plastic support.

Understand the inputs
  • Notch effect factor βkActual strength-reduction factor caused by the notch.
  • Stress concentration factor αkTheoretical, material-independent stress magnification at the notch (from charts or FEA).
  • Support factor nMaterial- and size-dependent support effect; n > 1, approaching 1 for brittle behaviour.
Example

αk = 2.1 and n = 1.4 give βk = 1.5.

Assumptions and limits

n must be taken from tables or charts for the material and part size (e.g. TB 3-7); βk applies to fatigue strength, not directly to static strength.

Technical article

Understand Notch effect factor from stress concentration and support factor

This calculator determines the notch effect factor βk from the theoretical stress concentration factor αk and the support factor n, showing the actual strength reduction caused by a notch.

What does this quantity describe?

The stress concentration factor αk describes the purely geometric, material-independent stress magnification at a notch (e.g. a hole, shoulder or groove). The support factor n accounts for the fact that ductile materials can yield locally at the notch root, relieving part of the theoretical stress peak (a support effect). The notch effect factor βk = αk/n is the actually effective reduction factor governing fatigue strength.

Think of αk as the theoretical backup height at a bottleneck in a rigid pipe. If the pipe material is instead compliant (like a ductile material), it locally relieves part of that backup — the support factor n describes exactly this relief effect.

Formula and variables

βk = αk / n

  • βk = αk / n
  • αk = βk · n
  • n = αk / βk
Symbol / inputMeaning
Notch effect factor βkActual strength-reduction factor caused by the notch.
Stress concentration factor αkTheoretical, material-independent stress magnification at the notch (from charts or FEA).
Support factor nMaterial- and size-dependent support effect; n > 1, approaching 1 for brittle behaviour.

Choose the inputs correctly

αk is the theoretical stress concentration factor, taken from notch charts, tables (e.g. TB 3-6) or an FEA for the given notch geometry and load type. n is the support factor, which depends on material, relative stress gradient and part size (e.g. from TB 3-7).

How to use the calculator

First determine αk for the notch geometry at hand and n for the material and part size, then enter both here to get βk.

Worked example

αk = 2.1 and n = 1.4 give βk = 2.1/1.4 = 1.5.

Understand the result and units

βk = 1.5 means the notched part's fatigue strength must be reduced by a factor of 1.5 relative to the unnotched fatigue strength. A value near 1 would indicate near-insensitivity to the notch.

αk, n and βk are all dimensionless.

Why βk is always smaller than αk

For ductile materials, the support factor n is always greater than 1, because local yielding at the notch root relieves the stress peak relative to the purely elastic calculation described by αk. For ideally brittle materials, n approaches 1, and βk approaches αk because no yielding is available to provide support. The gap between αk and βk is thus a direct measure of the material's ductility at the notch root.

Typical applications

The notch effect factor is used in fatigue and endurance strength verification for notched parts such as shaft shoulders, holes, grooves and thread run-outs, e.g. as an input to DIN 743.

Assumptions, limits and common mistakes

βk applies to fatigue strength (cyclic loading); for static strength, the notch effect is instead accounted for separately via the plastic support factor npl. The support factor n must be correctly taken from tables for the specific material and part size and is not universal.

Common mistake: A common mistake is equating βk with αk and neglecting the support effect of ductile materials entirely — this leads to an unnecessarily conservative (too low) fatigue strength estimate. n is also sometimes set to 1 across the board, which is only correct for very brittle materials.

Frequently asked questions

Where do I get αk?

From notch charts or tables for the specific notch shape (e.g. TB 3-6 in Roloff/Matek) or from an FEA stress analysis.

Where do I get the support factor n?

From material- and size-dependent tables (e.g. TB 3-7), depending on the relative stress gradient at the notch.

Does βk apply to static load too?

No, for purely static loading the plastic support factor npl governs instead, not βk.

What happens when two notches are close together?

Their stress concentration factors can interact; Roloff/Matek gives a separate superposition formula for interacting (overlapping) notches.

How do I use βk further?

βk reduces the part's fatigue strength within a fatigue-strength verification, e.g. as an input to DIN 743 for shafts.