Mtzul = 0.9·Remin·(h−t1)·ltr·(d/2)·i·φ
Method C checks only the contact pressure in the hub keyway and does not replace a full verification under Method A or B.
Method C checks only the contact pressure in the hub keyway and does not replace a full verification under Method A or B.
Select a target and calculate.
Method C checks only the contact pressure in the hub keyway and does not replace a full verification under Method A or B.
Remin=310 N/mm², h−t1=11 mm, ltr=163 mm, d=210 mm and φ=1 (standard example D.3.2) give pzul=279 N/mm² and Mtzul≈52,526 N·m.
Torque only, at most two keys, no moment reversal and ltr≤1.3·d; the implied fatigue statement holds only for DIN 6885-1 key dimensions. Not a substitute for the complete verification under Method A or B.
This calculator performs the preliminary sizing of a parallel key connection using Method C of DIN 6892. This method checks only the contact pressure in the hub keyway and is explicitly intended for early, approximate sizing, not final component release.
Method C determines the allowable torque from the allowable contact pressure pzul=0.9·Remin (equation 35) and the bearing area in the hub keyway: Mtzul=pzul·(h−t1)·ltr·(d/2)·i·φ (equation 34). Remin is the smallest yield strength of the materials involved, h−t1 the effective bearing height, and φ a load-sharing factor accounting for uneven load sharing with two keys.
Mtzul = 0.9·Remin·(h−t1)·ltr·(d/2)·i·φ
| Symbol / input | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Allowable torque Mtzul | Preliminary allowable torque of the key connection per Method C; must be at least the equivalent moment KA·Mtnenn. |
| Minimum yield strength Remin | Smallest yield strength among shaft, hub and key material; use Rm instead of Re for brittle hub material. |
| Effective bearing height h−t1 | Difference between key height h and shaft keyway depth t1; the bearing height in the hub keyway per Figure 9. |
| Bearing key length ltr | Effective bearing length of the key; must satisfy the application limit ltr≤1.3·d. |
| Shaft diameter d | Shaft diameter in the region of the key connection. |
| Load-sharing factor φ | φ=1 for one key (i=1); φ=0.75 for two keys offset by 180° (i=2), since they do not share load exactly evenly. |
Remin is the smallest yield strength among shaft, hub and key material. h−t1 is the difference between key height and shaft keyway depth. ltr is the bearing key length; it must not exceed 1.3 times shaft diameter d. φ is 1 for one key and 0.75 for two keys offset by 180°.
Take material properties from the relevant datasheet or standard and use the minimum. Take geometry from the DIN 6885-1 key table for the actual shaft diameter. Compare the result Mtzul against the equivalent moment Mteq=KA·Mtnenn; only if Mtzul≥Mteq is the connection adequately sized under Method C.
Remin=310 N/mm², h−t1=11 mm, ltr=163 mm, d=210 mm and φ=1 (standard example D.3.2) give pzul=0.9·310=279 N/mm² and Mtzul=279·11·163·105=52,525,935 N·mm≈52,526 N·m.
If Mtzul is below the required equivalent moment, the connection is insufficient under Method C; in the cited standard example, with Mteq=61,250 Nm, this is exactly the case, so the connection there does not suffice. A larger shaft diameter or a second key raise Mtzul disproportionately, or by a factor of 2·0.75=1.5 for the second key.
Remin is a stress (yield strength); h−t1, ltr and d are lengths; φ is dimensionless. Mtzul is output as a torque.
Only equations (33) to (35) from section 8 of the locally available DIN 6892:2025-10 are used. The calculator does not add material tables, notch factors or the full fatigue verification under Method A or B; these remain visible inputs or are explicitly outside the model.
Early, approximate sizing of parallel key connections in a drivetrain before a full calculation under Method A or B including notch effect, load distribution and shaft fatigue strength.
Torque only (equation 33), at most two keys (i≤2), no moment reversal and ltr≤1.3·d. The implied fatigue statement of Method C (section 8.5) holds only for key dimensions per DIN 6885-1, not for other geometries such as AGMA keys.
Common mistake: Do not substitute full key height h for the effective bearing height h−t1. Method C explicitly does not apply under moment reversal; use Method B instead. Do not confuse φ with the number of keys i.
No. Method C is explicitly intended only for preliminary sizing; component release requires Method A or B including notch effect and load distribution.
From the locally available DIN 6892:2025-10, section 8 (equations 33 to 35) and its worked example in Annex D.3.2.
Two keys offset by 180° do not, in practice, share load exactly evenly; the standard accounts for this with a reduction to 75% of double the single-key capacity.