Compression spring fatigue utilization (generic Goodman model)
Calculate the mean stress τm, stress amplitude τa and fatigue utilization of a compression spring between two working points s1 and s2. The corrected stresses come unchanged from the validated EN 13906-1 stress core; you supply the permissible stress amplitude.
This is a generic Goodman model, not a DIN EN 13906-1 fatigue diagram: the standard's diagram data is proprietary and neither embedded here nor invented.
τaGoodman
02
Fatigue utilization
Set the inputs and calculate.
Inputs and method
Compression spring fatigue utilization (generic Goodman model)
Calculate a compression spring's mean stress, stress amplitude and fatigue utilization at two working points, building on the validated EN 13906-1 stress core.
Inputs
The same spring geometry and material data as the existing EN 13906-1 compression-spring calculator (wire diameter, coil diameter, number of coils, length, two deflections, tensile strength), plus a permissible stress amplitude τkH,perm from your own source.
Calculation
The corrected lower and upper stresses τku, τko are taken unchanged from the existing EN 13906-1 stress core. From these follow the mean stress τm=(τko+τku)/2 and the stress amplitude τa=(τko−τku)/2. The fatigue utilization is τa/τkH,perm.
Example
With τku≈198 MPa and τko≈396 MPa, τa≈99 MPa; at a permissible stress amplitude of 150 MPa this gives a utilization of 66%.
Sources and limits: Classical Goodman/Haigh diagram principle of fatigue strength assessment; DIN EN 13906-1's own diagram is proprietary and is not reproduced here -- the permissible stress amplitude must come from your own documented source.
Technical article
Compression spring fatigue utilization (generic Goodman model) in detail
Calculate a compression spring's mean stress, stress amplitude and fatigue utilization at two working points, building on the validated EN 13906-1 stress core.
What is fatigue utilization under the Goodman method?
Fatigue utilization under the Goodman principle compares the actual stress amplitude (the stress swing τa) against an amplitude permissible for the given mean stress. It is therefore a general, material-independent fatigue assessment method -- the specific permissible-amplitude numbers for spring wire are usually supplied by a Goodman diagram such as the one in DIN EN 13906-1.
Formula and variables
Utilization = τa / τkH,perm
τm = (τko+τku)/2
τa = (τko−τku)/2
Safety = τkH,perm / τa
Symbol / input
Meaning
τku, τko
Corrected lower and upper stress at s1 and s2 respectively, taken unchanged from the EN 13906-1 stress core.
τm, τa
Mean stress and stress amplitude of the spring loading.
τkH,perm
Permissible stress amplitude at the given mean stress, from your own source (e.g. the DIN EN 13906-1 Goodman diagram or the FKM guideline).
Choose the inputs correctly
The same spring geometry and material data as the existing EN 13906-1 compression-spring calculator (wire diameter, coil diameter, number of coils, length, two deflections, tensile strength), plus a permissible stress amplitude τkH,perm from your own source.
How to use the calculator
Enter the same spring geometry and material data as the existing compression-spring calculator (wire diameter, coil diameter, number of coils, free length, the two deflections s1/s2, tensile strength, end type, bearing coefficient). Add the permissible stress amplitude τkH,perm from your own documented source.
Worked example
With τku≈198 MPa and τko≈396 MPa, τa≈99 MPa; at a permissible stress amplitude of 150 MPa this gives a utilization of 66%.
How should τm, τa and the utilization be interpreted?
τm sets where the working point sits on the Goodman diagram's mean-stress axis; τa is the vertical distance from that axis. A utilization τa/τkH,perm < 1 means the working point sits below the (externally determined) Goodman limit line.
Lengths in mm, tensile strength and permissible stress amplitude in MPa; results in MPa and percent or dimensionless.
Typical applications
Estimating whether a compression spring already sized to EN 13906-1 stays within a known permissible stress amplitude under dynamic loading between two working points (s1, s2), without re-implementing the existing spring calculator's stress formulas.
Assumptions, limits and common mistakes
Classical Goodman/Haigh diagram principle of fatigue strength assessment; DIN EN 13906-1's own diagram is proprietary and is not reproduced here -- the permissible stress amplitude must come from your own documented source.
Common mistake: Don't confuse the permissible stress amplitude τkH,perm with the tensile strength Rm -- Rm is a static material property, τkH,perm comes from a fatigue/Goodman diagram for the specific wire grade and mean stress. Without a documented τkH,perm, the reported utilization is only a plain ratio calculation, not a DIN EN 13906-1 fatigue verification.
Frequently asked questions
Why doesn't this calculator determine on its own whether the spring survives?
Because the Goodman diagrams needed for that in DIN EN 13906-1 are wire-diameter- and material-dependent, copyrighted table data not available in this project without a verified source. Instead, the calculator evaluates the general Goodman relationship using a permissible stress amplitude you supply yourself.
Where do I get the permissible stress amplitude τkH,perm?
From the DIN EN 13906-1 Goodman diagram for the wire grade used and the calculated mean stress, or from a more current documented source such as the FKM guideline 'Analytical strength assessment of springs and spring elements'.
What is the difference from the outputs already in the compression-spring calculator?
The existing calculator reports the stress range (corrected_stress_range) and a general warning, but does not assess it against a permissible amplitude. This calculator adds exactly that missing assessment.
What does a utilization above 100% mean?
The actual stress amplitude τa exceeds the entered permissible stress amplitude τkH,perm -- a calculated fatigue risk suggesting either a spring redesign or a re-check of the permissible stress value.