What do ISO 6432 and ISO 15552 actually standardize -- force or dimensions?
ISO 6432 defines the bore series and mounting dimensions of small, single-rod round cylinders (8 to 25 mm bore in this implementation), ISO 15552 the larger series of profile cylinders with detachable, interchangeable mountings (32 to 320 mm bore). Both standards define only dimensions and connection sizes for interchangeability between manufacturers -- no force, speed or service-life rating. This calculator uses a force requirement only as a starting point to find the matching standard bore; the result is the orderable size with its area ratio, not primarily a force value as in the separate force/air-consumption calculator.
How to use the calculator
Enter series (ISO 6432 or ISO 15552), operating gauge pressure, required force, direction, stroke, target speed and efficiency. The calculator returns the smallest matching standard bore with rod diameter and area ratio, plus -- as a check -- available force, force margin and required normalized flow.
Worked example
F = 500 N, p = 6 bar(g), extending, series ISO 15552: required area A = F/(p*eta) = 500/(6e5*0.85) ~= 981 mm^2, calculated bore diameter ~= 35.4 mm. The series has no 35 mm step; the next standard bore 40 mm with a 16 mm rod is selected, available force Fmax = 6e5*pi/4*0.04^2*0.85 ~= 641 N, force margin about 28%.
Why is the available force only a check value?
The reported available force Fmax and force margin confirm that the selected standard bore carries the load -- but they are the outcome of the bore selection, not its target. Because bores come in discrete standard steps, a 0% force margin is the exception; typically there is a jump to the next step. The required normalized flow shows whether a standard valve can actually deliver the target speed -- a sufficiently large bore is useless if the valve or line cannot supply the needed airflow.
Pressure in bar(g), or bar(a) for the air quantity, force in N, stroke and diameter in millimetres, speed in mm/s, normalized flow in Nl/min.
Typical applications
Selecting a market-standard, interchangeable pneumatic cylinder size for a new design, checking whether an existing bore belongs to the matching ISO series, estimating the normalized flow needed for the target speed for valve and line sizing.
Assumptions, limits and common mistakes
ISO 6432:2008 and ISO 15552:2018 define bore/rod series, port and mounting dimensions for pneumatic cylinders with piston rod.
Common mistake: Don't use the exact calculated, non-standard bore -- market-standard cylinders come only in certain standard sizes. Don't confuse operating gauge pressure with the absolute pressure needed for the air-quantity calculation: cylinder force follows from gauge pressure against the atmosphere-vented opposite side, while normalized flow follows from absolute pressure. Don't label ISO 6432 as generically "short-stroke" -- the standard defines a bore series of small round cylinders, not a stroke limit.
Frequently asked questions
What distinguishes ISO 6432 from ISO 15552?
ISO 6432 standardizes a bore series of small, compact round cylinders; ISO 15552 the larger series of profile cylinders with detachable, interchangeable mountings. Both define dimensions and connection sizes, not a stroke limit or force rating.
Which bore sizes do the two standards cover?
In this implementation, ISO 6432 from 8 to 25 mm and ISO 15552 from 32 to 320 mm bore -- the complete standard series can include additional intermediate or edge sizes depending on the manufacturer.
Up to what pressure do the standard series apply?
The standards themselves do not set a single maximum pressure; they define dimensions. The permissible operating pressure follows from the specific manufacturer product's rating and is typically around 10 to 16 bar for standard pneumatic cylinders.
Which dimensions are standardized for interchangeability?
Bore and rod diameter, the resulting area ratio, and port and mounting dimensions -- not seal system, material or cushioning design.
Is a cylinder from different manufacturers therefore fully interchangeable?
Only dimensionally and at the standardized connection sizes. Seal system, end-of-stroke cushioning, material and permissible side load can differ between manufacturers despite an identical standard bore.
Why is retraction force lower than extension force?
Retraction only has the annular area, reduced by the piston-rod cross-section, available, while extension force relies on the full piston area. The area ratio phi states the factor by which force and speed change as a result.
When is gauge pressure used and when absolute pressure?
Cylinder force follows from gauge pressure (difference to atmosphere), since the opposite side vents to atmosphere. Absolute pressure is needed only to convert to normalized flow (air quantity at reference conditions).