Plain bearing fundamentals

Plain Bearing PV Value Calculator

Calculate the PV value of a plain bearing from specific load p and sliding speed v – a common but on its own insufficient indicator of thermal duty.

01

Inputs

02

PV value result

ƒ(x)

Set the inputs and run the calculation.

Technical article

Plain Bearing PV Value Calculator

Calculate the PV value of a plain bearing from specific load p and sliding speed v – a common but on its own insufficient indicator of thermal duty.

Formula

PV = p * v

The product of specific load and sliding speed correlates with the frictional heat generated per unit area, and is therefore used as an approximate indicator of the thermal-tribological duty of a plain bearing, especially for dry-running or boundary-lubricated polymer and sintered bearings.

What this model does not show

A low PV value alone is not an approval. p and v each have their own independent limits: a very high specific load at very low speed can give a low PV yet still overload locally (e.g. risk of seizure); conversely very high speed at low load can trigger other failure mechanisms (wear, heating) that a PV limit alone does not capture. There is no universal, material-independent PV limit.

Worked example

With p = 2.5 MPa (from the Plain bearing specific load calculator) and v = 3.927 m/s (from the Plain bearing sliding speed calculator, d = 50 mm, n = 1,500 rpm): PV = 2.5 MPa x 3.927 m/s = 9.82 MPa*m/s. Since 1 MPa*m/s = 1 W/mm2, this corresponds to an area-specific frictional power density of 9.82 W/mm2 -- a value to be checked against an actual datasheet for the material pairing used, not a rule of thumb.

Common mistakes

  • Checking only the PV value while forgetting to also check p and v individually against their own limits.
  • Using a 'generic' PV limit found online that applies to a different material pairing or lubrication type.
  • Misreading MPa*m/s and W/mm2 as different physical statements instead of recognizing they are numerically identical.

Frequently asked questions

Is meeting a PV limit sufficient proof by itself?

No. A PV limit is necessary but not sufficient. p and v must also each individually stay within the permissible values for the actual material pairing.

Why do MPa*m/s and W/mm2 give the same number?

1 MPa = 1e6 Pa = 1e6 N/m2. Multiplied by 1 m/s that gives 1e6 (N/m2)(m/s) = 1e6 W/m2 = 1 W/mm2 -- the units are numerically interchangeable even though written differently.

For which bearing types does the PV value matter most?

Mainly for dry-running or boundary-lubricated plain bearings (e.g. polymer or sintered bearings), where frictional heat is barely carried away by a load-bearing oil film and thermal duty dominates.

Where do I get a permissible PV limit?

Only from an actual manufacturer datasheet for the material pairing, lubrication, ambient temperature and duty type used -- there is no material-independent standard value.

Can a low PV value still cause damage?

Yes. Very high specific load at very low speed can cause local seizure despite a low PV; very high speed at low load can trigger other wear mechanisms. The PV product alone does not fully capture these cases.

What comes after the PV value?

For a full hydrodynamic assessment (instead of an approximate PV estimate), the Plain bearing Sommerfeld number and Plain bearing operating clearance calculators give a more differentiated basis.

Sources

  • Roloff/Matek Maschinenelemente Formelsammlung, 15th ed. 2019, Ch. 15 Plain bearings.
  • GGB plain-bearing manufacturer documentation on PV ratings for composite bearings.